In the volatile global luxury market, Hermès demonstrates far stronger resilience than Chanel—a conclusion backed by authoritative financial data, industry reports from Bain & Company and Brand Finance, and their distinct business models and market performances amid economic headwinds. Hermès’ resilience stems from its unshakable super luxury positioning, extreme scarcity control, and a core product ecosystem with inherent investment value, while Chanel, though a top-tier luxury brand, faces greater pressure from market fluctuations due to its broader product matrix and relatively loose supply control.
Financial Resilience: Steady Growth vs. Volatile Decline
Hermès has maintained an unbroken streak of steady growth even in the toughest market conditions, a testament to its robust financial resilience. According to its 2025 financial reports, Hermès achieved a 9% year-on-year revenue growth at constant exchange rates in the first three quarters, with its core leather goods division surging by 12.6%—a standout performance when the global luxury market was mired in a slump. In 2024, a year that saw most luxury giants post declines, Hermès closed with a record €15.2 billion in sales, an 15% year-on-year increase, and its fourth-quarter revenue even soared by 18%, far exceeding market expectations. Its operating profit margin has long stayed at around 42%, the highest in the luxury industry, thanks to strong pricing power and cost control.
In stark contrast, Chanel’s financial performance has shown significant volatility in recent years. 2024 marked its first revenue decline since 2020, with full-year sales falling 5.3% to $18.7 billion, operating profit plummeting 30% to $4.48 billion, and net profit dropping 28.2%. Regional performance was even more uneven: its Asia Pacific market (including China) saw a 9.3% revenue slump, and the American market fell by 4.3%. While Chanel’s brand value surged 45% to $37.9 billion in 2025, this growth was driven more by emotional marketing such as the centennial celebration of N°5 perfume rather than solid fundamental sales, and its profit margin (34%) remains far lower than Hermès, reflecting weaker ability to resist economic risks.
Market Resilience: Scarcity-Driven Loyalty vs. Demand Fluctuations
Hermès’ market resilience is rooted in its extreme scarcity control and ultra-high customer loyalty, which insulate it from mainstream consumer demand fluctuations. Its core products like Birkin and Kelly bags operate on a strict allocation system—buyers must build long-term consumption records and purchase secondary products worth 1.5-4 times the bag’s value to qualify for an allocation, with waiting lists stretching for months or years. This deliberate scarcity not only maintains the brand’s super luxury aura but also cultivates an ultra-sticky customer base composed of ultra-high-net-worth individuals (UHNWIs), royal families, and top collectors. Even when China’s luxury market saw an 18-20% sales drop in 2024, Hermès achieved steady growth in the Greater China region through precise operation of its allocation system, with store visitor conversion rates far exceeding industry averages. Its global expansion strategy, such as taking direct control of stores in the Middle East, also paid off handsomely, with a 123% revenue surge in the UAE in 2024, diversifying its market risks.
Chanel, while also emphasizing exclusivity, adopts a relatively loose supply model for its core products, leading to greater sensitivity to market demand changes. Its classic Classic Flap and 2.55 bags are more accessible than Hermès’ core styles, with no mandatory allocation system, making their sales more dependent on the consumption power of middle and high-end consumers—this group is far more affected by macroeconomic factors such as consumer confidence than Hermès’ UHNWI clientele. In 2024, the slump in Chanel’s Asia Pacific sales was largely due to weakened consumption power of this mainstream high-end group amid economic uncertainty. Additionally, Chanel’s over-reliance on leather goods and beauty products has made its product matrix less diversified in terms of risk resistance: its beauty line, while driving brand exposure, has lower profit margins and is more vulnerable to competition from mass luxury brands, while its ready-to-wear and accessory lines lack the investment value of Hermès’ core products.
Operational Resilience: Craftsmanship Barriers vs. Model Limitations
Hermès’ operational resilience is built on its uncompromising artisanal craftsmanship and solid industrial barriers, which are almost impossible for competitors to replicate. All its core leather goods are handmade by master artisans who undergo 5-7 years of rigorous training, with a single Birkin bag taking 18-24 hours to make, and key processes like saddle stitching and edge painting completed entirely by hand without any machine involvement. This pure artisanal model not only ensures unparalleled product quality but also forms a natural production capacity barrier—Hermès deliberately limits its production scale to maintain scarcity, avoiding the inventory pressure that plagues most luxury brands. Its product ecosystem, covering leather goods, equestrian equipment, high-end ready-to-wear, home decor, and even private jet customization, all adheres to the same high craftsmanship standards, creating a holistic luxury lifestyle layout that further strengthens its operational stability.
Chanel’s operational model, by contrast, has inherent limitations that affect its resilience. It adopts a semi-handmade production model for its core leather goods, combining machine production with manual finishing to meet market demand, which has led to brand trust crises—for example, a 2024 short film showcasing the production of its Classic Flap bag was criticized for excessive machine processes and had to be taken down, damaging its premium image. While Chanel plans to open 48 new stores in 2025 (half in China and the US) and expand its distribution in second and third-tier cities, this expansion strategy also brings higher operational costs and market risks: second and third-tier markets have more volatile consumer demand, and blind expansion may dilute the brand’s exclusivity and further pressure profits. Its marketing missteps, such as the poorly received advertising copy for the CHANEL J12 BLEU limited-edition watch, also reflect weaker operational control compared to Hermès.
Long-Term Resilience: Investment Value vs. Fashion Dependence
Hermès’ long-term resilience is ultimately underpinned by its unique investment value, which has transcended the nature of consumer goods and become a recognized alternative asset. According to Rebag’s 2025 Clair Report, Hermès has an average resale value retention rate of 138%, with rare material Birkin bags achieving an annual appreciation rate of 10-15%, and some limited-edition pieces fetching 3-5 times their original price at auctions. In the secondary market, Hermès’ core products have strong liquidity, even in economic downturns, making them a “safe...
Company Profile
Guangzhou Hongrui International Trade Co., Ltd. has been deeply engaged in the international trade industry for over a decade, We are a factory—what makes us stand out is our focus on "1:1 high-quality original leather production". This core advantage allows us to fully control every link from raw material selection to craftsmanship, using genuine original leather that matches top luxury standards, and reproducing product details with 1:1 precision, ensuring each leather product meets the highest quality expectations.
Contact Information
Name:
Miss. lily
WhatsApp:
+8613710029657
WeChat:
wxid_sefg102piwyt22
Email:
3811694357@qq.com
Your message must be between 20-3,000 characters!
